Detailed statistics: Class distributions away from representations regarding accessory (AAI) and you may caregiving (P-CAI)
We restricted analysis to the three major AAI classifications (Autonomous, Dismissive and Preoccupied) since the examination of unresolved states of mind with respect to attachment, and how these states of mind may be related to later caregiving behaviors and thinking, was beyond the scope of this paper. Replacing the 10 AAI-Unresolved protocols with secondary classifications resulted in 46 parents (59.7%) classified as Autonomous, consistent with the van IJzendoorn and Bakermans-Kranenburg ( 1996 ) norms presented for the AAI (58% base rate). Seventeen parents (22.1%) were classified as Preoccupied and 14 (18.2%) as Dismissive. On the P-CAI, 50 parents were classified as Autonomous (64.9%), 16 as Dismissive (20.8%) and 11 as Preoccupied (14.3%). There were no assignments to the Disorganized category. Classification distributions did not differ for dads, as compared to parents, neither with respect to the AAI (Likelihood exact ratio G(dos, 1) = 1.4, p = .49) nor regarding the P-CAI (Likelihood exact ratio G(2, 1) = 2.4, p = .31).
Cross-tabulation of each parent’s attachment (AAI) and caregiving (P-CAI) classifications (Table 2) revealed strong concordance (fathers’ Likelihood exact ratio G(cuatro, 1) = , p< .0001, Kappa = .61, p< .0001; mothers' Likelihood exact ratio G(4, 1) = 25.4, p < .0001, Kappa = .58, p< .0001). Prediction of P-CAI classification from AAI classification resulted in 77.8% exact agreement for fathers, 78% exact agreement for mothers, and 77.9% exact agreement for the entire sample (86% for Autonomous, 72.7% for Preoccupied and 56.2% for Dismissive).
Stepwise logistic regression was did on the P-CAI categories dichotomized, vulnerable (Dismissive/Preoccupied) instead of safer (Autonomous). Original investigation to assess potential has an effect on from history parameters (parent years, several years of degree, amount of children, age appeal guy, relational position) indicated that the fresh parent’s numerous years of knowledge was in fact for the the woman/his caregiving symbolization category (Wald = 5.21, p = .02), with many years of studies a bit decreasing the probability of an enthusiastic Autonomous group regarding parental caregiving. It adjustable is actually regulated to own for the subsequent investigation (joined as the 1) https://datingranking.net/shaadi-review/. To own prediction out-of safer caregiving category (P-CAI/F) i thus registered, for the step one, several years of studies and also the parent’s possible enjoying and you may rejecting experience which have parents, correspondingly (Dining table step 3). The only significant predictor try likely enjoying knowledge with the mom (Wald = 8.97, p = .003). Significantly, years of education made zero significant contribution on latest predictive model. This new co-parent’s accessory scriptedness (ASA-score), with high ratings showing a defined breakdown of delicate and responsive child-rearing, registered during the one minute action rather increased forecast regarding secure caregiving, and that classified 84.2% of one’s cases truthfully. Moms and dad intercourse, registered into the a third step, generated zero share, exhibiting that father or mother intercourse is not accused from inside the, and does not separate the brand new anticipate from, full quality of caregiving image (P-CAI) (H5). On the latest design (Dining table 3), likely loving skills through its moms and dads (AAI) significantly improved, and you may likely enjoy regarding rejection of the their fathers (AAI) notably faster, parents’ likelihood of becoming classified given that that have Independent caregiving representations.
Authored on line:
To address hypotheses 2–4 concerning links between specific state of mind dimensions of the parent’s caregiving representation and his/her classification with respect to attachment, MANOVA was carried out with P-CAI state of mind subscales as dependent variables: idealization of the child and co-parent, respectively, derogation of the relationship to the child, anger towards the child and co-parent, respectively, parental guilt, and preoccupied feelings of rejection. Parent AAI-classification (Dismissive vs. Preoccupied vs. Autonomous) and gender (mother vs. father) were grouping variables. In addition to the expected main multivariate effect of AAI classification (Wilks’?, F(fourteen, 128) = 7.28, p< .0001, ? 2 = .445), the analysis revealed a multivariate effect of parent gender (Wilks'?, F(7, 64) = 2.65, p = .018, ? 2 = .225), and a multivariate AAI-classification X gender interaction effect (Wilks’?, F(fourteen, 128) = 2.74, p = .001, ? 2 = .231). Among parents with Preoccupied (AAI/E) current attachment representations, there was more preoccupying anger toward the co-parent among mothers, compared to fathers, F(step one, 71) = 4.88, p = .03, ? 2 = .06 (Mfathers = 2.10, SD = 1.41, Mmothers = 2.37, SD = 1.87) (Figure 1(a)). The multivariate effect of co-parent attachment scriptedness (ASA) as covariate was not statistically significant in this analysis (Wilks’?, F(eight, 64) = 1.87, p = .09, ? 2 = .169), but a univariate effect on parental guilt was found, with more elaborate and readily available attachment scripts in the co-parent predicting lower levels of preoccupying guilt in the parent. Notably, the gender difference in preoccupying anger towards the co-parent was no longer significant.